The number of publications on dissemination has increased dramatically over the years since classic work on diffusion of innovations. Frequently recommended dissemination practices to reach non-research audiences include “Designing for Dissemination”, use of multiple channels, development of guides to program implementation, and engagement of multiple types of stakeholders in the development and evaluation of interventions and dissemination plans. Training Institute for Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health Regional PH Org,ĭissemination, defined as “an active approach of spreading evidence-based interventions to the target audience via predetermined channels using planned strategies”, is the critical process linking research findings to practitioners who can implement them, leading to benefits among the people or communities of interest. National Cancer Institute Dissemination and Implementation TIDRH, Veterans Association Quality Enhancement Research Initiative KT Canada, Mentored Training for Dissemination and Implementation Research in Cancer CDC,Ĭenters for Disease Control and Prevention VA QUERI, Implementation Research Institute MT-DIRC, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute CIHR KT,Ĭanadian Institutes of Health Research Knowledge Translation IRI, The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Ĭompeting interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official positions of the National Institutes of Health or the American Heart Association. Brownson is supported by funding from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092949, P30DK092950, ). Knoepke is also supported by the American Heart Association (18CDA34110026, ). Knoepke, Matlock, and Glasgow are supported the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL136403, ). The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available on the Open Science Framework at. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.ĭata Availability: The survey used in this study is included in this published article as the sole appendix. Received: ApAccepted: OctoPublished: November 13, 2019Ĭopyright: © 2019 Knoepke et al. Alberto Conejero, IUMPA - Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, SPAIN clinical research settings.Ĭitation: Knoepke CE, Ingle MP, Matlock DD, Brownson RC, Glasgow RE (2019) Dissemination and stakeholder engagement practices among dissemination & implementation scientists: Results from an online survey. Stakeholder involvement in research was common, with clinical and community-based researchers engaging stakeholder groups in broadly similar ways, but with critical differences noted between researchers with greater seniority, those with more D&I training, those based in the United States vs. Journal publication was identified as the most impactful on respondents’ careers (94%), but face-to-face meetings with stakeholders were rated as most impactful on practice or policy (40%). Respondents indicated routinely engaging in a variety of dissemination-related activities, with academic journal publications (88%), conference presentations (86%), and reports to funders (74%) being the most frequent. (69%) or Canada (13%), representing a mix of clinical (28%) and community settings (34%). The majority of respondents were from university or research settings in the United States. Surveys were received from 210 participants.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |